Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 26.5.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Instant and Hy4 preview specifications
GPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index42.745.3
Released2026-05-052026-08-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.83
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked273

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena WebDev—1632
SciCode48.6%—
LMArena Coding1433—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1426—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52—

Math Hy4 preview leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.1%—
ProofBench—75%
LMArena Math1420—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
GPQA Diamond82.5%—
LMArena Expert1409—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Hy4 preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena Vision1250—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1428—
LMArena German1411—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1431—
LMArena Spanish1429—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantHy4 preview
LMArena Text1419—
LMArena Creative Writing1419—
LMArena Multi-Turn1433—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper