Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs o4-mini
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 5 categories and o4-mini in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o4-mini leads 40.8 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 12% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 26% for o4-mini.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 41.6 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1368 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 45% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
| GSO | — | 3.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.6% |
| CadEval | — | 62% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 826.17 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.72 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: —, o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 53.2% |
| GDPval | — | 25.3% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1351 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | 145.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 38.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 58.7% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 9.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 77.6% |
| LMCA | — | 26.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
Math o4-mini leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | 36.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | 81.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1389 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 24.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | 79.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1343 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 18.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 82% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 18.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 73.5% |
Multimodal Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | 1194 |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1354 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | 1364 |
| LMArena German | 1411 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1308 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1334 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | 1347 |
Instruction Following o4-mini leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1321 |
| IFEval | — | 92.8% |
Long Context o4-mini leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1315 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1353 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1294 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75% |
| WildBench | — | 85.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than o4-mini?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or o4-mini better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and o4-mini share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.