Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.1

Rank #109 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 29.8.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index42.130.2
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14081090
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991073

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math13891117

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert13971064

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13831033
LMArena Chinese14331070
LMArena Russian14001045
LMArena French1398—
LMArena German1384—
LMArena Japanese1351—
LMArena Korean1347—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13781056

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13961071

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text13891080
LMArena Creative Writing13561046
LMArena Multi-Turn14131053
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper