Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 174× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 16.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 30% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 0.9% for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 30% | 0.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | 6.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Trinity Large Thinking?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 174× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity Large Thinking share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.