Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 24.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 38.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1286 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1276 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1266 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1277 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1342 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.