Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
GPT-5.4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 42.6 to 37.1.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 38.2 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
GPT-5.4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.