Model comparison
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 Pro
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 58.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 3 categories and GPT-5.4 Pro in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 71.4 to 42.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 95% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 58.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper at $4 / $20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 68.5 | 58.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-03-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $4 | $30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $20 | $180 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 71.4 (#1), GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 54.4% | — |
| CursorBench | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1820 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | — |
| SciCode | 66.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 57.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1545 | — |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#13), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 79.5 (#2), GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 92.5% | 83.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | 94.5% |
| CritPt | 31.7% | 30% |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 88.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 58.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.8% |
| EBR-Bench | 71.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1545 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 71% | — |
| DTBench | 98.9% | — |
| LMCA | 68.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 159.12 |
Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 92.4 (#2), GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 91.2% | 82.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 95% | 58.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 50% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 37.5% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 66.6 (#9), GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.6% | 94.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | 46.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1564 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 56.5 (#2), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 83.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 59.8 (#1), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1513 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1572 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1532 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 80.1 (#2), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1535 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 47.3 (#18), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1540 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 78.7 (#3), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1518 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1538 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2050 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1520 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than GPT-5.4 Pro?
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 58.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.4 Pro?
Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.4 Pro better for coding?
Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.4 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.4 Pro share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 35 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.