Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Mercury 2

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mercury 2 costs 180× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 23.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 30% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 0.8% for Mercury 2.
  • Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 Pro and Mercury 2 specifications
GPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
ProviderOpenAIInception
Noometry Index58.939.1
Released2026-03-052026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M128K
Max output128K50K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$180$0.75
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
WeirdML57.4%43.2%
LMArena WebDev—1171
SciCode—38.7%
LMArena Coding—1391
ALE-Bench—785.58

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
CritPt30%0.8%
ARC-AGI-283.3%—
SimpleBench74.1%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
Chess Puzzles58.6%—
EnigmaEval23.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1362
Epoch Capabilities Index158.93—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 458.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)50%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)37.5%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.3%12.3%
GPQA Diamond94.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.3%—
SimpleQA Verified46.3%—
LMArena Expert—1358

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
LMArena Non-English—1331
LMArena Chinese—1417
LMArena Russian—1304

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following—1329

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
LMArena Longer Query—1330

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMercury 2
LMArena Text—1355
LMArena Creative Writing—1289
LMArena Multi-Turn—1358

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Mercury 2?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mercury 2 costs 180× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Mercury 2 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Mercury 2 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper