Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.0 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 41% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | 0.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | 125.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 41% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.