Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Jamba Large
GPT-5.4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Jamba Large in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 17.4.
- Jamba Large is cheaper at $2 / $8 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Jamba Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Jamba Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | AI21 Labs |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2025-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $8 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Jamba Large: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Jamba Large |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Jamba Large: 17.4
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Jamba Large |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 26.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Jamba Large: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Jamba Large |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Jamba Large: 37.0
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Jamba Large |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | 9.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Jamba Large?
GPT-5.4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Jamba Large?
Jamba Large is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $8 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Jamba Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Jamba Large has 2.