Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen-14B

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 55.7 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen-14B specifications
GPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.931.4
Released2026-03-172023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.25—
Results tracked4018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14051071
SciCode46.9%—
WeirdML49.2%—
ALE-Bench1,005—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts13811027
Epoch Capabilities Index145.81113.03
ARC-AGI-25.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%—
ARC-AGI-151.5%—
CritPt9.3%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LMCA36.9%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
ForecastBench57.3—
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Math14061068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)25.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)6.3%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond78.5%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.1%—
LMArena Expert1396—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1196—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English13591041
LMArena Chinese13921077
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1367—
LMArena Japanese1343—
LMArena Korean1320—
LMArena Russian1363—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following13621031

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query13661028

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen-14B
LMArena Text13721051
LMArena Creative Writing13141028
LMArena Multi-Turn13821022

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper