Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen-14B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1072 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1077 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1031 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1029 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen-14B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen-14B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.