Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5.4 nano

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.4 nano score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.2 vs 41.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #111 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 5 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 23.8 to 16.3.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index41.241.9
Released—2026-03-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.25
Results tracked2040

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Coding14551404
SciCode—46.9%
WeirdML—49.2%
ALE-Bench—1,005

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Hard Prompts14461380
ARC-AGI-2—5.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—39.7%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—51.5%
CritPt—9.3%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—36.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.78
ForecastBench—57.3

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Math14371406
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—87.8%
ProofBench—5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—25.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Expert14271397
GPQA Diamond—78.5%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.1%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Vision12481196

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Non-English14361359
LMArena Chinese15121391
LMArena French14661396
LMArena German14621368
LMArena Japanese13831342
LMArena Korean14061321
LMArena Russian14461363
LMArena Spanish14731368

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Instruction Following14131362

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Longer Query14221365

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Text14451372
LMArena Creative Writing14261313
LMArena Multi-Turn14331382

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5.4 nano?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.4 nano score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.2 vs 41.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 43.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.4 nano share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper