Model comparison
GPT-5.4 nano vs Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5.4 nano costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 23.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 5% for GPT-5.4 nano and 87% for Kimi K3.
- GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.25 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Kimi K3.
- Kimi K3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 59.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2026-07-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $3 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $15 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 53 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82), Kimi K3: 60.6 (#8)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 46.9% | 59.5% |
| WeirdML | 49.2% | 82.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1404 | 1509 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,005 | 1,524 |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1659 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 nano: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#19)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GBAEval | — | 48.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |
Reasoning Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | 60.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 51.5% | 94.5% |
| CritPt | 9.3% | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | 39% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1495 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | 26% |
| DTBench | 80.3% | 91.2% |
| LMCA | 36.9% | 52.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.78 | 157.68 |
| ForecastBench | 57.3 | 61.1 |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 39.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 93.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
Math Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76), Kimi K3: 74.0 (#13)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 44.9% | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | 39% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | 5% | 87% |
| LMArena Math | 1406 | 1493 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 25.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#19)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | 50.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1520 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.1% | — |
Multimodal Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73), Kimi K3: 38.4 (#58)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1196 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136), Kimi K3: 56.5 (#20)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1391 | 1528 |
| LMArena French | 1396 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1368 | 1474 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1492 |
| LMArena Korean | 1321 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1363 | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1368 | 1478 |
Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139), Kimi K3: 77.8 (#13)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1362 | 1481 |
Long Context Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#27)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1365 | 1494 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137), Kimi K3: 76.7 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1372 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1313 | 1452 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1382 | 1488 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5.4 nano costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K3?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 lists at $3 and $15.
Is GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K3 better for coding?
Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.6 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Kimi K3 share?
35 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.