Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 nano
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5.4 nano costs 8.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 40.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 5% for GPT-5.4 nano.
- GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 41.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2026-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 400K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.25 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 61% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | 1405 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | 1,005 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 49.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), GPT-5.4 nano: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1381 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | 9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | 145.81 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 39.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 51.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| DTBench | — | 80.3% |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.3 |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | 44.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 87.8% |
| ProofBench | 100% | 5% |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | 1406 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 25.9% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 78.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | 1396 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.1% |
Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | 1196 |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1363 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | 1362 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1372 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | 1382 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than GPT-5.4 nano?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5.4 nano costs 8.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 43.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.4 nano share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.