Model comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen Max
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 45.5 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
- GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper at $0.75 / $4.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- GPT-5.4 mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 33K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.50 | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | 1288 |
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1269 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.84 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | 1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1248 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1440 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1409 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1368 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1405 | 1290 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1262 |
Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1412 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Qwen Max?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen Max?
GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.
Is GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen Max better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 mini does, with 400K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen Max share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.