Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen Max

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 39.3 to 22.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.534.7
Released—2024-04-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked1223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Coding14831288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14581269

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Math14381275
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.1%
MATH Level 5—67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Expert15061248
GPQA Diamond—56.1%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Non-English14341263
LMArena Chinese14631254
LMArena Russian14231274
LMArena French—1330
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1205
LMArena Korean—1142
LMArena Spanish—1290

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following14271262

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Longer Query14411288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen Max
LMArena Text14481282
LMArena Creative Writing13681248
LMArena Multi-Turn14421277

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper