Model comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.84 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | — |
| LMArena French | 1440 | — |
| LMArena German | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1405 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.