Model comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4 in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 43.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 73.6% for Grok 4.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 48.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.3% | 45.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | 1408 |
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | 47.3% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | 16% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | 28% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.84 | 146.44 |
| ForecastBench | 57 | 60.9 |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
Math Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 84% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1422 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | 87% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1415 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
Multimodal GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Too close to call
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1440 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1409 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1368 | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1405 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1412 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 mini or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 45.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Grok 4 share?
30 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.