Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 44.0.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 47.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.46 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |
Math Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1211 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1409 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | 1412 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 43.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Grok 4 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.