Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 52.3.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index42.839.2
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14081316

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13991299

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13891304

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13971279

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13821290
LMArena Chinese14321331
LMArena Russian14001324
LMArena French1397—
LMArena German1384—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1346—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13781287

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13961307

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13891321
LMArena Creative Writing13551328
LMArena Multi-Turn14121292
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper