Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Granite 4.2 3b

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 47.2.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index42.839.4
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding14081361

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts13991306

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Math1389—

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert13971315

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English13821268
LMArena Chinese14321269
LMArena Russian14001249
LMArena French1397—
LMArena German1384—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1346—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following13781273

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query13961291

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text13891293
LMArena Creative Writing13551205
LMArena Multi-Turn14121290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Granite 4.2 3b?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper