Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen Turbo
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 38.2 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1389 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | — |
| LMArena French | 1397 | — |
| LMArena German | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen Turbo?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.