Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Chat vs Llama 3.2 90B
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 35.4 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1389 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | — |
| LMArena French | 1398 | — |
| LMArena German | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1356 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Llama 3.2 90B?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.