Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Llama 3.2 90B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 38.5 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.