Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 82× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.2

Rank #34 Reported

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 49.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index52.245.0
Released2025-12-112026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$21$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$168$1.60
Results tracked832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)79.3%74.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.41147.39
ARC-AGI-254.2%—
SimpleBench57.4%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74%34.4%
FrontierMath Tier 446%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1467
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)31.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1439

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1454

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1454
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
LMArena Multi-Turn—1459

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 82× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper