Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 38.7 to 21.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 51.2% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index52.345.3
Released2025-12-172026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$3$1.60
Results tracked5932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14601473
SWE-bench Verified75.4%—
FrontierCode—10.2%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1439—
SWE-bench Multilingual72.7%—
SciCode—45.5%
GSO9.8%—
WeirdML61.6%—
ALE-Bench1,367—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench64.3%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
τ²-bench Retail76.8%—
τ²-bench Telecom91.2%—
DeepResearch Bench49.8%—
BALROG48.1%—
GDP.pdf10%—
LMArena Search1198—
Vending-Bench 23,635—

Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)83.1%74.8%
Chess Puzzles40%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14651460
Mystery Game Puzzles26%17%
DTBench89.1%84%
LMCA43.1%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index151.8147.37
ARC-AGI-233.6%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
ARC-AGI-184.7%—
CritPt—9.1%
ForecastBench58.5—

Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%93.3%
LMArena Math14731466
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.6%—
ProofBench15%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)35.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond89.4%87.9%
LMArena Expert14621467
SimpleQA Verified66.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.5%—

Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12851279
LMArena Document14131444
GeoBench88%—
VPCT72.6%—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14581445
LMArena Chinese15111510
LMArena French14771473
LMArena German14971471
LMArena Japanese14891413
LMArena Korean14431415
LMArena Russian14801457
LMArena Spanish14691457

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14371440

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14521455

Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14661455
LMArena Creative Writing14571439
LMArena Multi-Turn14711460

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper