Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 47.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Plus costs 51× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 38.2% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 47.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $3 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 60.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 147.67 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1449 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 38.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1456 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1425 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1440 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 47.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Plus costs 51× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.