Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 106× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 54.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 106× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.