Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 31.7.
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 35.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1209 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1202 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1216 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1214 |
| LMArena French | — | 1196 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1203 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1225 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1214 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.