Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 125.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.