Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Yi-34B
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 21.6.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 117.39 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1061 |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1091 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Yi-34B?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Yi-34B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.