Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Hunyuan Large Vision
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 35.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1308 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1268 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1252 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1251 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.