Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.2

Rank #178 Reported

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 34.7 to 29.3.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index38.239.3
Released2025-11-122026-08-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.16
Results tracked618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1337—
LMArena Coding—1370
ALE-Bench1,245—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts—1335

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1355

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert—1354

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English—1292
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1280
LMArena Japanese—1213
LMArena Korean—1233
LMArena Russian—1257
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following—1317

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query—1312

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text—1324
LMArena Creative Writing—1254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280
LMArena Multi-Turn—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper