Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); GPT-5.1-Codex-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini OpenAI

37.3

Unranked Sparse

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.1-Codex-mini scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 31.6.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-mini.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
GPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index37.350.3
Released2025-11-122026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.87
Results tracked219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: 31.6, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev12441629
SciCode—60.9%
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.1-Codex-mini leads

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: 38.5, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench61.6%—
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench—70%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex-mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-mini better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); GPT-5.1-Codex-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-mini lists at $0.25 and $2.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex-mini has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper