Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 40.1 to 14.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.245.3
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding12861487
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12511483
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math12441474
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert12081489
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12381465
LMArena Chinese12291534
LMArena French12641484
LMArena German12371487
LMArena Japanese11751495
LMArena Korean11731438
LMArena Russian12531471
LMArena Spanish12611470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12411467
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query12611476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text12551470
LMArena Creative Writing12331464
LMArena Multi-Turn12651478
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper