Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B
Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 48.5 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for GPT-4 and 86.7% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 8K.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 8K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 31.2 (#277), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 43.8 (#72)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 12.4% | 41% |
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1445 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.6% |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.7 (#48)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 52.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -11.34 |
Reasoning GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 17.3 (#285), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.8 (#302)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1433 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | 9% |
| DTBench | 62.7% | 80.3% |
| LMCA | 17.1% | 29.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.88 | 143.87 |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | 59.7 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 69.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 11% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 10.1 (#304), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 48.5 (#51)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1431 |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | 68.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 18.4 (#277), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.5 (#67)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | 80.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1460 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 84.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 40.8 (#210), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.5 (#84)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1282 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | 1400 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1391 |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1429 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 65.5 (#217), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.8 (#132)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1408 |
| IFEval | — | 83.5% |
Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#207), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#25)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1426 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 75% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
GPT-4: 35.0 (#263), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1432 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83% |
| WildBench | — | 86.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.
Is GPT-4 or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?
Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 235B-A22B does, with 131K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?
28 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.