Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Qwen Turbo

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 429× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Turbo in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Turbo leads 15.3 to 10.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 23% for GPT-4 and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
  • Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Qwen Turbo specifications
GPT-4Qwen Turbo
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.127.1
Released2023-03-142024-11-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window8K1M
Max output8K16K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$60$0.20
Results tracked383

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Qwen Turbo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
LMArena Coding1254—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Qwen Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Qwen Turbo: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
Chess Puzzles4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1241—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Qwen Turbo leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%6.1%
MATH Level 523%56.2%
LMArena Math1269—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond35.7%41.8%
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Qwen Turbo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
LMArena Non-English1246—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1251—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Qwen Turbo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Qwen Turbo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
LMArena Longer Query1244—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Qwen Turbo: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen Turbo
LMArena Text1263—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—
LMArena Multi-Turn1257—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Qwen Turbo?

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 429× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Qwen Turbo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper