Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Mercury 2

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Mercury 2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 34.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 12.4% for GPT-4 and 43.2% for Mercury 2.
  • Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • Mercury 2 accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Mercury 2 specifications
GPT-4Mercury 2
ProviderOpenAIInception
Noometry Index29.139.1
Released2023-03-142026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window8K128K
Max output8K50K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$60$0.75
Results tracked3817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
WeirdML12.4%43.2%
LMArena Coding12541391
LMArena WebDev—1171
SciCode—38.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
ALE-Bench—785.58
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Mercury 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts12411362
CritPt—0.8%
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math1269—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Expert12111358
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.3%
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Non-English12461331
LMArena Chinese12421417
LMArena Russian12511304
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following12411329

Long Context Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Longer Query12441330

Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Mercury 2
LMArena Text12631355
LMArena Creative Writing12441289
LMArena Multi-Turn12571358
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Is GPT-4 or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mercury 2 does, with 128K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Mercury 2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper