Model comparison
GPT-4 vs GPT-4.1 mini
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 3 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 34.7 to 18.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 23% for GPT-4 and 87.3% for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 12.4% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | 48.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | 7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1349 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | 7% |
| DTBench | 62.7% | 68.8% |
| LMCA | 17.1% | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | 135.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 44.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1343 |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | 65.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1338 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | 1283 | 1358 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1319 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1333 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
Long Context GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1300 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1354 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than GPT-4.1 mini?
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or GPT-4.1 mini?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.
Is GPT-4 or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.6 vs 30.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and GPT-4.1 mini share?
28 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.