Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Phi-4 Mini

GPT-4 Turbo and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 22.4 to 15.3.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Phi-4 Mini specifications
GPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.530.9
Released2023-11-062024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$10$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$30$0.30
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
SciCode—10.8%
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
LMArena Coding1268—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Phi-4 Mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
SimpleBench25.1%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LMArena Math1272—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Phi-4 Mini leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1272—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1267—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Phi-4 Mini?

GPT-4 Turbo and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

GPT-4 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper