Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs GPT-4 Turbo
Amazon Nova Pro and GPT-4 Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 5 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 9.0.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2023-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 128K |
| Max output | 10K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $30 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1268 |
| WeirdML | — | 18% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 86.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), GPT-4 Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.7% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 127.25 |
| SimpleBench | — | 25.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 9.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.4 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1272 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1223 |
| MMLU | 82% | 81.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
Multimodal GPT-4 Turbo leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1090 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1276 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1259 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1194 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1187 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1259 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1260 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1249 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1254 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4 Turbo leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1267 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than GPT-4 Turbo?
Amazon Nova Pro and GPT-4 Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or GPT-4 Turbo?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?
Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and GPT-4 Turbo share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.