Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1289 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.