Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 13.9.

Side by side

GPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index37.241.3
Released2025-02-27—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding13961361
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14031374
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14121359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert13941339
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14131363
LMArena Chinese14211417
LMArena French14181391
LMArena German14571355
LMArena Japanese14161342
LMArena Korean13921351
LMArena Russian14191368

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14041344
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14061366
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14171377
LMArena Creative Writing13941359
LMArena Multi-Turn14441387
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper