Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.7

Rank #322 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 40.7.
  • GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
  • GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index27.731.5
Released2025-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output33K105K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$2
Results tracked383

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—
LMArena Coding1306—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LMArena Math1274—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1272—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1260—
LMArena Chinese1270—
LMArena German1288—
LMArena Japanese1199—
LMArena Russian1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
IFEval84.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
Fiction.LiveBench25%—
LMArena Longer Query1283—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Medium 3.1
EQ-Bench Creative Writing9461476
LMArena Text1285—
LMArena Creative Writing1260—
WildBench81.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Mistral Medium 3.1?

GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper