Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 40.7.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.7 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | — |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Mistral Medium 3.1?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.