Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-4.5
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-4.5 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-4.5 leads 41.8 to 23.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 25% for GPT-4.1 nano and 63.9% for GPT-4.5.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.7 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-02-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | 19% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1397 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 75.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |
Reasoning GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 0.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | 10.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1404 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | 136.74 |
| SimpleBench | — | 34.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 71.1% |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 64.3% |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.7 |
| LiveBench | — | 69% |
Math GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | 37.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1412 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | 78.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 69.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 68.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1394 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 13.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
Multimodal GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | 1195 |
| VPCT | — | 45% |
Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1288 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1199 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1419 |
| LMArena French | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 72.3% |
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
Long Context GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | 63.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | 1406 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | 1394 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | 1258 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1444 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.6% |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 61.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than GPT-4.5?
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and GPT-4.5 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.