Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Yi-1.5-34B
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 34.7 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 87.3% for GPT-4.1 mini and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 47 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1169 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1160 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
Math Yi-1.5-34B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | 25.5% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1144 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1121 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1139 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1143 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1153 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Yi-1.5-34B?
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Yi-1.5-34B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.