Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 44.7% for GPT-4.1 mini and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 47 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | 17% |
| DTBench | 68.8% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 21.1% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 146.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | 21% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | 25.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | — |
| LMArena French | 1358 | — |
| LMArena German | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Qwen3.5 Plus?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.