Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-4.1 mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 29.3 to 10.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 33.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1349 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.01 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1343 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1338 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | — | 1358 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1319 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1333 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1300 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1354 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-4.1 mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-4.1 mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.