Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Qwen Turbo
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4.1 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 34.7 to 22.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 44.7% for GPT-4.1 mini and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 47 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
Math GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | 56.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 41.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | — |
| LMArena French | 1358 | — |
| LMArena German | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Qwen Turbo?
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4.1 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.